As a parent in the VCUSD, I am aghast at how little effort is made to: 1) secure and protect student information, 2) notify students/parents when data is provided to various third party entities and 3) ensure third parties are accountable if any data breaches have occurred.
My first exposure to the district’s “stoopid” attitudes on data was when my daughter was “dojo-ed”. She created an account for herself (under the direction of the teacher without my permission), chose a cartoonish monster avatar and a few clicks later, an IT company located in San Francisco began receiving data about her behavior.
How creepy that this company prides itself on “disruption” and “building community” by tracking children’s behaviors, their school locations, and their images. Sounds very similar to another social media company that prides itself on building community but recently “facebonked” due to mismanagement of user privacy.
Other problematic situations in our district:
- student email accounts include student ID numbers
- classroom visits by military recruiters collected my child’s information through a paper survey (even though I specifically declined sharing information with recruiters)
- AERIES information is not consistently used by all staff, so parents and students are not provided a complete electronic academic record.
- a teacher asked students to send their assignments to his personal email account
At the VCUSD board meeting on July 18th, 2018, the board approved (on the consent agenda without discussion) two new contracts for over $400K that include sharing student data to outside entities – Equal Opportunity Schools (EOS) and Student Innovations & Advocacy (SIA). These contracts will receive money to help create:
- equitable access to Advanced Placement (AP) classes (with EOS), and
- a bunch of letters using a ROBOT (with SIA). Yes – SIA calls their data sharing software a ROBOT.
I already receive robotic emails based on information (often erroneous) entered in our attendance systems. Now, the district will pay more than $400K over three years for SIA’s ROBOT to send letters about attendance and absences, using our data.
Regarding EOS and AP courses, the vast majority of our high schools are students that are underserved in AP classes (e.g. African American, Latino, low-income). How can we miss enrolling these students in AP classes? What “systemic reason” exists that we need to pay almost $50K (plus EOS travel expenses) to ensure equal access?
As a dear friend often says, “you can’t fix stupid.”
Before the district enters into any more contracts that share student data,
- the Superintendent should conduct a complete inventory of all the software and social apps that are used throughout the district.
- Then, the district should decide what is acceptable use (or not) and update the district’s technology agreements.
- Next, parents should be notified how their student data is shared and how they can opt out.
In addition, all staff must use one central system for all student data, including attendance, grades, behaviors, reminders, etc. No staff gets to use/create a separate system (on paper or through other apps) that holds protected student information. If any violations or breaches of data occur, parents and students must be notified that their protected information may be at risk.
Identify theft and human trafficking of minors using digital tools is rising. Educational entities have a moral obligation to ensure they do not place our students in harm’s way. I am confident more methods exist to protect our students’ information.
The first step is a willingness to stop being “stoopid” about Big Data.